It is currently Tue Nov 20, 2018 6:07 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:18 pm
Posts: 11783
bradshaw2ben wrote:
steelmann58 wrote:
he needs to be healthy because he can"t always use that as an excuse.

I think the fact that he hasn't made it through an entire season healthy is a bigger issue than anything he did or didn't do on the field.


What good things did he do on the field?

_________________
86n96 wrote:
I might've finally been right about something.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16602
Steelafan77 wrote:
I see the same thing Scunge. I see a defense with LeBeau remnants combined with Tomlin influences. Obviously it has no place in the NFL the way it's set up now, well..., last season anyway. Teams figure out where to target the weaknesses for better success. Having one do-it-all star player [in the past Polamalu, until recently Shazier] in this era of the NFL won't work anymore. There needs to be more of a 'hive' mentality IMHO. Contributions from all over the defense has to be the goal. Tuitt and Heyward up front last season did a lot of the dirty work with the occasional VWill and Hilton contribution. The secondary outside of Haden [when he was playing] and Hilton was woefully below average. LB's were..., well, where were they? I agree for the most part the defense is in some sort of transition. What that is I haven't a clue.

You guys act like our defense was brutally bad last year. It was closer to being good than awful.

_________________
VASteelerGuy wrote:
These refs suck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:57 pm
Posts: 3181
I think the Steelers hamstring themselves with OLBs. It is really hard to get the pass rush and edge set and cover LB in one package. Now they are lucky to get one of those traits that is decent. I want to see them draft a pass rush specialist.

_________________
To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
- Henri Poincaré


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:13 pm
Posts: 4054
bradshaw2ben wrote:
Steelafan77 wrote:
I see the same thing Scunge. I see a defense with LeBeau remnants combined with Tomlin influences. Obviously it has no place in the NFL the way it's set up now, well..., last season anyway. Teams figure out where to target the weaknesses for better success. Having one do-it-all star player [in the past Polamalu, until recently Shazier] in this era of the NFL won't work anymore. There needs to be more of a 'hive' mentality IMHO. Contributions from all over the defense has to be the goal. Tuitt and Heyward up front last season did a lot of the dirty work with the occasional VWill and Hilton contribution. The secondary outside of Haden [when he was playing] and Hilton was woefully below average. LB's were..., well, where were they? I agree for the most part the defense is in some sort of transition. What that is I haven't a clue.

You guys act like our defense was brutally bad last year. It was closer to being good than awful.


Finished 5th in the league overall, broke the franchise record for sacks, was the main reason this team was worth a damn for the first half of the season when our highly paid offense was floundering. They didn’t have the depth to sustain the Shazier injury, who was playing like an All Pro before he went down, but they were pretty damn good last season. Excited to see the growth of Watt, Burns, and to hopefully get back healthier versions of Tuitt, Hargrave, and Dupree. Not to mention Bostic and Burnett, who I like both, and the rooks we’re going to add.

_________________
SteelThrillsseeker wrote:
Dad showed up after work and according to her the entire hospital hears my dad yell you are not naming our son Hoss.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 11765
TB wrote:
...but they were pretty damn good last season.


Against bad offenses and 2nd and 3rd string QB's.....otherwise, not so much. That defense last year should be the poster child for "paper tiger".

_________________
------------------------------------------------------


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:08 pm
Posts: 526
KC wrote:
Had high hopes for Dupree going into last season.

HE SUCKED COCK.


Not that there's anything wrong with that...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:08 pm
Posts: 6637
bradshaw2ben wrote:
Steelafan77 wrote:
I see the same thing Scunge. I see a defense with LeBeau remnants combined with Tomlin influences. Obviously it has no place in the NFL the way it's set up now, well..., last season anyway. Teams figure out where to target the weaknesses for better success. Having one do-it-all star player [in the past Polamalu, until recently Shazier] in this era of the NFL won't work anymore. There needs to be more of a 'hive' mentality IMHO. Contributions from all over the defense has to be the goal. Tuitt and Heyward up front last season did a lot of the dirty work with the occasional VWill and Hilton contribution. The secondary outside of Haden [when he was playing] and Hilton was woefully below average. LB's were..., well, where were they? I agree for the most part the defense is in some sort of transition. What that is I haven't a clue.

You guys act like our defense was brutally bad last year. It was closer to being good than awful.
For most fans, those long runs, runs for first downs on 3rd and 9, and long pass plays over 30 yards coupled with allowing over 40 pts to Jacksonville kinda outweighs any good stats or what the the defense did the rest of the season.

_________________
"I wish Fraudlin would get testicular cancer and die after he watches me anally penetrate his wife."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 2:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 6:11 pm
Posts: 2157
The defense played decent with shazier against some pretty shitty QBs early on
They folded completely without shazier against quality or physical Os


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 2:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:12 pm
Posts: 4201
They also folded against a shitty QB in Chicago with Shazier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 2:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 6:11 pm
Posts: 2157
If they do it
IMO it's more a reflection of the current troubles at LB and not Dupree real worth


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 6:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:13 pm
Posts: 4054
955876 wrote:
They also folded against a shitty QB in Chicago with Shazier.


Gave up 17 whole points in 4 quarters.

Eli Rogers muffed a punt at our 29 leading to points.

We also had the blocked field goal where the Bears got the ball at our 1, 3 easy points that ST gave up right before the end of the half.

They absolutely did their job that game. We lost because Ben and the offense shit their pants on the road against a crappy opponent, as we’ve seen plenty of times before.

_________________
SteelThrillsseeker wrote:
Dad showed up after work and according to her the entire hospital hears my dad yell you are not naming our son Hoss.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:45 pm
Posts: 13800
Well..., I suppose the same can be said for those of you that feel like the defense was good. They couldn't stop the run. At. All!
When has there been a Steelers defense in recent history that was unable to stop the run as horribly? Then add to that those ever common long pass plays where the dumb asses in the secondary got smoked brutally and embarrassed. Like I stated before. They broke a fucking franchise sack record. Big fucking whoopty doo. Where did that get them? :lol:

I want to stop the run. Defend against the pass by forcing the QB to hold onto the pigskin longer. Creating splash play opportunities like INT's, FF's, pressures and sacks. Or, just Get off the field on 3rd downs. I don't care about franchise records unless they result in Championships.

Gonzo wrote:
The defense played decent with shazier against some pretty shitty QBs early on
They folded completely without shazier against quality or physical Os
That is exactly my point about One player they expect superhuman effort from like Troy in the past and Ryan until injury. After those two super star players left the field the defense(s) seemed stale and easily beatable to the point of humiliating ass whoopings. More of a hive mentality is needed. Depth is critical, FC stated in the part 2 podcast. Without Depth I don't see the Steelers making any Championships while Ben is still under center.


Last edited by Steelafan77 on Tue Apr 24, 2018 6:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 6:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:12 pm
Posts: 4201
Quote:
Gave up 17 whole points in 4 quarters.


And also gave up 222 rushing yards to a team that had as close to zero threat of the pass as you’ll get in today’s NFL.

Don’t know what your definition of “folded” is but when a defense can’t stop an extremely limited & one dimensional offense like the Bears they will fit my definition of the term.

I don’t disagree with you about the offense with the exception that I’d say they sucked TOO that day.

Being so busy figuring out where they stood socially on the whole kneel or stand thing was obviously too much for them to do AND play a football game that day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 7:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 6:11 pm
Posts: 2157
TB wrote:
955876 wrote:
They also folded against a shitty QB in Chicago with Shazier.


Gave up 17 whole points in 4 quarters.

Eli Rogers muffed a punt at our 29 leading to points.

We also had the blocked field goal where the Bears got the ball at our 1, 3 easy points that ST gave up right before the end of the half.

They absolutely did their job that game. We lost because Ben and the offense shit their pants on the road against a crappy opponent, as we’ve seen plenty of times before.


You can deflect to the O all you like. The D was poor that day - thy got steamrolled via the run against a team they Knew was going to run all day or throw short. That’s why I mentioned shitty play vs quality Os and Physical Olines/RBs. The D needs work - the O is less a function of poor play IMO as it is choice of plays and pace. Hopefully the new OC will bring change although I doubt it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:13 pm
Posts: 4054
12 drives in regulation: 3 scores allowed, one was a 29 yard drive, one was a 1 yard drive. Their drives that day in regulation:

3 plays, -1 yard
6 plays, 29 yards
6 plays, 21 yards
6 plays, 12 yards
9 plays, 75 yards
1 play, -4 yards
3 plays, -2 yards
2 plays, -1 yards
10 plays, 33 yards
3 plays, 3 yards
8 plays, 38 yards

One drive over 38 yards. WTF do you want, the 2001 Ravens? They did their job.

_________________
SteelThrillsseeker wrote:
Dad showed up after work and according to her the entire hospital hears my dad yell you are not naming our son Hoss.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 8:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:47 am
Posts: 4347
COR-TEN wrote:
bradshaw2ben wrote:
Steelafan77 wrote:
I see the same thing Scunge. I see a defense with LeBeau remnants combined with Tomlin influences. Obviously it has no place in the NFL the way it's set up now, well..., last season anyway. Teams figure out where to target the weaknesses for better success. Having one do-it-all star player [in the past Polamalu, until recently Shazier] in this era of the NFL won't work anymore. There needs to be more of a 'hive' mentality IMHO. Contributions from all over the defense has to be the goal. Tuitt and Heyward up front last season did a lot of the dirty work with the occasional VWill and Hilton contribution. The secondary outside of Haden [when he was playing] and Hilton was woefully below average. LB's were..., well, where were they? I agree for the most part the defense is in some sort of transition. What that is I haven't a clue.

You guys act like our defense was brutally bad last year. It was closer to being good than awful.
For most fans, those long runs, runs for first downs on 3rd and 9, and long pass plays over 30 yards coupled with allowing over 40 pts to Jacksonville kinda outweighs any good stats or what the the defense did the rest of the season.


We finished the RS 11th in Pts/Dr, 10th TO's/Dr

Respectable, gave us a fighting chance with the O expected to lead us in the PS and would have been something to build on if we hadn't lost Shazier.

The DL was unleashed to rush the passer more than under Lebeau which is something many of us wanted. Arrow WAS pointing up, IMO. I really thought there was a lot to like on the D moving forward but no Shazier changes everything.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 8:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 11765
And 9th in DVOA....which doesn't really meet the eyetest.

But the offenses they raced ranked 26th. And then you remember we caught a lot of those offenses starting a rookie QB and/or their back-up.

And, yes, then you lost Shazier. No surprise what happened in the playoffs. And I think Shazier only makes a marginal difference, but perhaps enough to sneak past JAX before another pasting at NE.

_________________
------------------------------------------------------


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:12 pm
Posts: 4201
Quote:
They did their job.


222 yards rushing.

84 net yards passing.

This wasn’t some multi-faceted offense they had to figure out.

You don’t have to be the 2001 Ravens to hold yourself to a higher standard.

Same result against the Jags. Twice.

This team was soft as wet butter against the run last year.

Might have cost us a SB...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2018 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:45 pm
Posts: 13800
Quote:
They did their job.



Poorly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2018 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:08 pm
Posts: 6637
Havoc wrote:
We finished the RS 11th in Pts/Dr, 10th TO's/Dr

Respectable, gave us a fighting chance with the O expected to lead us in the PS and would have been something to build on if we hadn't lost Shazier.

The DL was unleashed to rush the passer more than under Lebeau which is something many of us wanted. Arrow WAS pointing up, IMO. I really thought there was a lot to like on the D moving forward but no Shazier changes everything.
I agree. But just look at the responses here about the steelers' D. No doubt it has it's problems, but it wasn't as bad as is being made out to be here.

_________________
"I wish Fraudlin would get testicular cancer and die after he watches me anally penetrate his wife."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2018 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 11765
COR-TEN wrote:
D. No doubt it has it's problems, but it wasn't as bad as is being made out to be here.


Bad when it mattered....which begs the question if the talent is there but not the coaching.

_________________
------------------------------------------------------


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2018 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:19 am
Posts: 10004
TB wrote:
12 drives in regulation: 3 scores allowed, one was a 29 yard drive, one was a 1 yard drive. Their drives that day in regulation:

3 plays, -1 yard
6 plays, 29 yards
6 plays, 21 yards
6 plays, 12 yards
9 plays, 75 yards
1 play, -4 yards
3 plays, -2 yards
2 plays, -1 yards
10 plays, 33 yards
3 plays, 3 yards
8 plays, 38 yards

One drive over 38 yards. WTF do you want, the 2001 Ravens? They did their job.


The vaunted O scores 17 whole points against the Bears but managed 42 against Jax.

If the defense blew it, the offense surely didn't do any better.

Blind Fury.

_________________
Orangesteel wrote:
We could have ended the game there and Tomlin’s band of assholes let them back in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2018 12:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:12 pm
Posts: 4201
Wondering why it’s so hard to say both units sucked that day led by a staff that allowed them to focus on external nonsense.

But but but the offense was bad too.

Ummm how does that excuse the defense from getting steamrolled by a team with zero threat of a forward pass?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2018 1:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 12:38 pm
Posts: 782
955876 wrote:
Wondering why it’s so hard to say both units sucked that day led by a staff that allowed them to focus on external nonsense.

But but but the offense was bad too.

Ummm how does that excuse the defense from getting steamrolled by a team with zero threat of a forward pass?


Simple- Mike Glennon is Tomlin's kryptonite.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers Rumored to Exercise Bud Dupree's 5th-Year Contr
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2018 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:19 am
Posts: 10004
955876 wrote:
Wondering why it’s so hard to say both units sucked that day led by a staff that allowed them to focus on external nonsense.

But but but the offense was bad too.

Ummm how does that excuse the defense from getting steamrolled by a team with zero threat of a forward pass?


It does not excuse the defense, but the easy explanation is this:
The defense was a question mark and everyone knew it.
Everyone also knew and knows the talent gap of the starters on offense and defense in aggregate.
As too often happens, the offense failed to carry the team when it needed to.

So, the offense in mind is more blameworthy for the Bears loss.

Obviously not the case in the Jax loss.

_________________
Orangesteel wrote:
We could have ended the game there and Tomlin’s band of assholes let them back in.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DP39, Google [Bot], H0bb3s, Jobus Rum, Majestic-12 [Bot], Quixotic, swissvale72, tunch and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group