It is currently Sun Oct 21, 2018 12:01 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: YES! YES! YES!!!!! I LOVE YOU JON GRUDEN!!!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:20 am
Posts: 3765
Donnie Brasco wrote:
Nick79 wrote:
How about this rule, a catch is control of the ball (control being a judgment, one hand, two hand, between the knees-doesn't matter-up to the ref) for one second, both feet in bounds (although, I'd even make that 1 foot, to make it even easier), NON-REVIEWABLE JUDGMENT CALL. End of discussion.



Then the one Eagles TD in the SB would not have counted. He exchanged hands with the ball and did not possess it with either hand for your required 1 second


But with no replay, judgment call, if the ref throws up his arms, we aren't going to go ruin the day and "look at it again". So TD !!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: YES! YES! YES!!!!! I LOVE YOU JON GRUDEN!!!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:20 am
Posts: 3765
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Nick79 wrote:
How about this rule, a catch is control of the ball (control being a judgment, one hand, two hand, between the knees-doesn't matter-up to the ref) for one second, both feet in bounds (although, I'd even make that 1 foot, to make it even easier), NON-REVIEWABLE JUDGMENT CALL. End of discussion.


That's not the end of the discussion though, no matter how many capital letters you use. NFL referees are awful at judgement calls, which is exactly why replay was re-instituted to begin with. So take away replay and yes, the game speeds up, which is a good thing, but that won't stop CBS/NBC/FOX from replaying it 1,000 times, from it dominating sports media the ensuing week, etc.

Literally, nothing changes from how it is now except you shave 5-10 minutes off the game. That's it. It solves nothing meaningful. ....Well I'm hear saying it, I'm willing to accept mistakes like we used to, to get rid of replay.


Make it part of the TV contract with the networks that the announcers stop talking about something looking like an error and don't show it with an attitude of trying to say it is not good, show it only at full speed and no multiple angles- I honestly wouldn't care, and probably wouldn't notice if they didn't bring it up and keep showing it. JUST LET IT GO. NEVER SAY---- "They're going to have to look at that again" , make that banned speech, like how you can't say retard anymore.

YES- CENSOR what the announcers can talk about if they want PAID.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: YES! YES! YES!!!!! I LOVE YOU JON GRUDEN!!!!!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2018 6:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:34 am
Posts: 5500
Nick79 wrote:
Poltargyst wrote:
we need replay for the most egregious of errors, .


That would be nice if they could limit it to that, they don't even try! If you want to limit replay, you don't review every score, you don't review every turnover, you just review things that might have "most egregious of errors". And you limit it, like maybe give them 60 seconds max with no slow motion, why? Because if it really is "most egregious of errors" you don't need to slow it down to see it, because it's that obvious.


I can agree with this. Replay review is in real time and the official has 60 seconds to decide. Done.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: YES! YES! YES!!!!! I LOVE YOU JON GRUDEN!!!!!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2018 8:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:57 pm
Posts: 3142
Nick79 wrote:
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Nick79 wrote:
How about this rule, a catch is control of the ball (control being a judgment, one hand, two hand, between the knees-doesn't matter-up to the ref) for one second, both feet in bounds (although, I'd even make that 1 foot, to make it even easier), NON-REVIEWABLE JUDGMENT CALL. End of discussion.


That's not the end of the discussion though, no matter how many capital letters you use. NFL referees are awful at judgement calls, which is exactly why replay was re-instituted to begin with. So take away replay and yes, the game speeds up, which is a good thing, but that won't stop CBS/NBC/FOX from replaying it 1,000 times, from it dominating sports media the ensuing week, etc.

Literally, nothing changes from how it is now except you shave 5-10 minutes off the game. That's it. It solves nothing meaningful. ....Well I'm hear saying it, I'm willing to accept mistakes like we used to, to get rid of replay.


Make it part of the TV contract with the networks that the announcers stop talking about something looking like an error and don't show it with an attitude of trying to say it is not good, show it only at full speed and no multiple angles- I honestly wouldn't care, and probably wouldn't notice if they didn't bring it up and keep showing it. JUST LET IT GO. NEVER SAY---- "They're going to have to look at that again" , make that banned speech, like how you can't say retard anymore.

YES- CENSOR what the announcers can talk about if they want PAID.


Yes that always has worked :roll:

_________________
To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
- Henri Poincaré


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: YES! YES! YES!!!!! I LOVE YOU JON GRUDEN!!!!!
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:20 am
Posts: 3765
jebrick wrote:

Yes that always has worked :roll:

FIRE THEM if they go there. Why do they care that much? They fine coaches for criticizing officiating, don't let announcers do it either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: YES! YES! YES!!!!! I LOVE YOU JON GRUDEN!!!!!
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 6:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:35 pm
Posts: 7608
Nick, we need some form of replay. Get rid of the automatic reviews, keep coaches' challenges. They only get 3 per half or whatever and then only if they have time outs. They won't want to lose time outs, so they'll be very judicious about when they throw the red flag. Just like it was before automatic reviews. Even you, Nick, can handle that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: YES! YES! YES!!!!! I LOVE YOU JON GRUDEN!!!!!
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2018 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:20 am
Posts: 3765
Poltargyst wrote:
Nick, we need some form of replay. Get rid of the automatic reviews, keep coaches' challenges. They only get 3 per half or whatever and then only if they have time outs. They won't want to lose time outs, so they'll be very judicious about when they throw the red flag. Just like it was before automatic reviews. Even you, Nick, can handle that.


3 per half is too much. I realize that most people are anal and want to try for perfection, so replay isn't going away. I'd say best option is no automatic reviews, 1, maybe 2 per half and 60 second time limit for the review and no slow motion, review at normal speed within 60 seconds. With a clock visible to EVERYONE in the stadium and on TV.... BUZZER SOUNDS, refs walk away and either give a decision, or say they don't see obvious evidence to over turn within the mandated 60 seconds. This way, you could over turn the OBVIOUS errors, meaning things so fucking obvious it sticks out like a sore thumb, something like a railroad spike sticking out of a guys forehead, and really, that's what it should be about fixing. TOTALLY OBVIOUS AT FULL SPEED.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: YES! YES! YES!!!!! I LOVE YOU JON GRUDEN!!!!!
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2018 6:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:35 pm
Posts: 7608
Nick79 wrote:
Poltargyst wrote:
Nick, we need some form of replay. Get rid of the automatic reviews, keep coaches' challenges. They only get 3 per half or whatever and then only if they have time outs. They won't want to lose time outs, so they'll be very judicious about when they throw the red flag. Just like it was before automatic reviews. Even you, Nick, can handle that.


3 per half is too much. I realize that most people are anal and want to try for perfection, so replay isn't going away. I'd say best option is no automatic reviews, 1, maybe 2 per half and 60 second time limit for the review and no slow motion, review at normal speed within 60 seconds. With a clock visible to EVERYONE in the stadium and on TV.... BUZZER SOUNDS, refs walk away and either give a decision, or say they don't see obvious evidence to over turn within the mandated 60 seconds. This way, you could over turn the OBVIOUS errors, meaning things so fucking obvious it sticks out like a sore thumb, something like a railroad spike sticking out of a guys forehead, and really, that's what it should be about fixing. TOTALLY OBVIOUS AT FULL SPEED.

I could live with that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: YES! YES! YES!!!!! I LOVE YOU JON GRUDEN!!!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:20 am
Posts: 3765
The thing that ruined replay was going TOO FAR, super slow motion, super zoom in, 50 million angles and giving them too much time to think about it. Then it goes beyond looking for "obvious errors" and it becomes like trying to analyze at the atomic level looking to see of protons or nuetrons from the ball are shaking pollen dust off of individual blades of turf, and that's what has ruined the entire sport.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group