It is currently Tue Nov 20, 2018 11:54 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 103 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 1867
You didn't quit, did you? Just got another Mad Elf. I'd prefer to not be bored while I drink it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 1867
DANCE MONKEY, DANCE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9314
I’ll continue to provide material if you continue to provide mindless dumbfuck banter about games that you don’t even watch. Deal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9314
Wait, didn’t you see potential after watching tonight? How’s that possible?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 1867
Orangesteel wrote:
I’ll continue to provide material if you continue to provide mindless dumbfuck banter about games that you don’t even watch. Deal?


I have yet to provide anything towards a game I didn't watch, but if you're intent is to continue watching you strangle yourself in your own web of internet tough guy lies, then yeah, I'm all for it!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 1867
your*

I'm so uncivilized sometimes. Gawd.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9314
So how about just dumbfuck banter, to which there is plenty authored by you? Go watch the game, come back here, tell me what you saw that you liked? Can you figure that out?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9314
And please feel free to watch that with your software engineer friend, whatever the fuck that is.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 1867
Orangesteel wrote:
So how about just dumbfuck banter, to which there is plenty authored by you? Go watch the game, come back here, tell me what you saw that you liked? Can you figure that out?



I debunked your whole "Let's focus on this game and nothing else" mindset a few pages ago. That was never my intent to argue this specific game, nor have you kept that that scope, and I've outlined exactly why I shouldn't have to be kept that scope, etc.

The more you cling to it, the more you look like you have no other arguments against the things I've brought up and are just trying to narrow the scope to a degree that fits you.

It wreaks of desperation.

If you lost, fine, admit and I can respect that. We can all go to bed.

If you're going to keep making yourself look desperate, then that's fine. I have more beer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9314
Haha “lost”. You are funny, I’ll give you that. You don’t know dick about hockey and while you are a die hard pens fan which I can respect, you are dumber than a box of rocks. Enjoy your Tröegs. I’ve had it; it’s good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9314
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Orangesteel wrote:
So how about just dumbfuck banter, to which there is plenty authored by you? Go watch the game, come back here, tell me what you saw that you liked? Can you figure that out?



I debunked your whole "Let's focus on this game and nothing else" mindset a few pages ago. That was never my intent to argue this specific game, nor have you kept that that scope, and I've outlined exactly why I shouldn't have to be kept that scope, etc.

The more you cling to it, the more you look like you have no other arguments against the things I've brought up and are just trying to narrow the scope to a degree that fits you.

It wreaks of desperation.

If you lost, fine, admit and I can respect that. We can all go to bed.

If you're going to keep making yourself look desperate, then that's fine. I have more beer.


This is fucking hilarious by the way. Like so much nonsense hilarious.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 1867
Orangesteel wrote:
Haha “lost”. You are funny, I’ll give you that. You don’t know dick about hockey and while you are a die hard pens fan which I can respect, you are dumber than a box of rocks. Enjoy your Tröegs. I’ve had it; it’s good.


Dear Orange Crushed,

I know more than you do, that's for sure. Most surefire sign of a casual fan is the 'highlight reel" fan. IE, the guy notices the high profile misses and makes, and bases on his opinion only on those plays.

Guy plays a solid game 95% of the time he's on the ice, but let's up that one bad play? "THAT MOTHERFUCKING COCKSUCKER SUCKS AND IS THE WORST PLAYER IN HOCKEY!!!11!!!!"

Sound familiar? I pulled a very similar quote from you in another thread.

But you know you're SO negative so you just SO hardcore.

PS, speed this up. I bought this beer for T-day dinner tomorrow. I'm enjoying it way too much., Also, Mad Elf is good, but it's no Belgian dark.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 1867
Orangesteel wrote:
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Orangesteel wrote:
So how about just dumbfuck banter, to which there is plenty authored by you? Go watch the game, come back here, tell me what you saw that you liked? Can you figure that out?



I debunked your whole "Let's focus on this game and nothing else" mindset a few pages ago. That was never my intent to argue this specific game, nor have you kept that that scope, and I've outlined exactly why I shouldn't have to be kept that scope, etc.

The more you cling to it, the more you look like you have no other arguments against the things I've brought up and are just trying to narrow the scope to a degree that fits you.

It wreaks of desperation.

If you lost, fine, admit and I can respect that. We can all go to bed.

If you're going to keep making yourself look desperate, then that's fine. I have more beer.


This is fucking hilarious by the way. Like so much nonsense hilarious.


What part isn't true?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 1867
Just pulled an experiment on my dog. Put a treat in his general vicinity. He ate it. Put a treat in a place where he could see it, but couldn't access it. Ignored it.

Learn from this. Please.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9314
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Orangesteel wrote:
Haha “lost”. You are funny, I’ll give you that. You don’t know dick about hockey and while you are a die hard pens fan which I can respect, you are dumber than a box of rocks. Enjoy your Tröegs. I’ve had it; it’s good.


Dear Orange Crushed,

I know more than you do, that's for sure. Most surefire sign of a casual fan is the 'highlight reel" fan. IE, the guy notices the high profile misses and makes, and bases on his opinion only on those plays.

Guy plays a solid game 95% of the time he's on the ice, but let's up that one bad play? "THAT MOTHERFUCKING COCKSUCKER SUCKS AND IS THE WORST PLAYER IN HOCKEY!!!11!!!!"

Sound familiar? I pulled a very similar quote from you in another thread.

But you know you're SO negative so you just SO hardcore.

PS, speed this up. I bought this beer for T-day dinner tomorrow. I'm enjoying it way too much., Also, Mad Elf is good, but it's no Belgian dark.


Pleas show a quote where I referred to someone on this team as the worst player in hockey.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9314
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Just pulled an experiment on my dog. Put a treat in his general vicinity. He ate it. Put a treat in a place where he could see it, but couldn't access it. Ignored it.

Learn from this. Please.


Keep drinking.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 1867
Orangesteel wrote:
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Orangesteel wrote:
Haha “lost”. You are funny, I’ll give you that. You don’t know dick about hockey and while you are a die hard pens fan which I can respect, you are dumber than a box of rocks. Enjoy your Tröegs. I’ve had it; it’s good.


Dear Orange Crushed,

I know more than you do, that's for sure. Most surefire sign of a casual fan is the 'highlight reel" fan. IE, the guy notices the high profile misses and makes, and bases on his opinion only on those plays.

Guy plays a solid game 95% of the time he's on the ice, but let's up that one bad play? "THAT MOTHERFUCKING COCKSUCKER SUCKS AND IS THE WORST PLAYER IN HOCKEY!!!11!!!!"

Sound familiar? I pulled a very similar quote from you in another thread.

But you know you're SO negative so you just SO hardcore.

PS, speed this up. I bought this beer for T-day dinner tomorrow. I'm enjoying it way too much., Also, Mad Elf is good, but it's no Belgian dark.


Pleas show a quote where I referred to someone on this team as the worst player in hockey.


Out of that entire quote, THAT's the part you focused on? Really? Yeah, let's ignore the point of the post to focus on some obvious hyperbole.

Wow.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 1867
Orangesteel wrote:
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Just pulled an experiment on my dog. Put a treat in his general vicinity. He ate it. Put a treat in a place where he could see it, but couldn't access it. Ignored it.

Learn from this. Please.


Keep drinking.


The dog is. Still makes more logical arguments than you.


Last edited by Louis Lipps Service on Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9314
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Orangesteel wrote:
Haha “lost”. You are funny, I’ll give you that. You don’t know dick about hockey and while you are a die hard pens fan which I can respect, you are dumber than a box of rocks. Enjoy your Tröegs. I’ve had it; it’s good.


Dear Orange Crushed,

I know more than you do, that's for sure. Most surefire sign of a casual fan is the 'highlight reel" fan. IE, the guy notices the high profile misses and makes, and bases on his opinion only on those plays.

Guy plays a solid game 95% of the time he's on the ice, but let's up that one bad play? "THAT MOTHERFUCKING COCKSUCKER SUCKS AND IS THE WORST PLAYER IN HOCKEY!!!11!!!!"

Sound familiar? I pulled a very similar quote from you in another thread.

But you know you're SO negative so you just SO hardcore.

PS, speed this up. I bought this beer for T-day dinner tomorrow. I'm enjoying it way too much., Also, Mad Elf is good, but it's no Belgian dark.


Lol casual fan. How long have you been skating?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9314
Please, show the quote you refer to.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 1867
Orangesteel wrote:
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Orangesteel wrote:
Haha “lost”. You are funny, I’ll give you that. You don’t know dick about hockey and while you are a die hard pens fan which I can respect, you are dumber than a box of rocks. Enjoy your Tröegs. I’ve had it; it’s good.


Dear Orange Crushed,

I know more than you do, that's for sure. Most surefire sign of a casual fan is the 'highlight reel" fan. IE, the guy notices the high profile misses and makes, and bases on his opinion only on those plays.

Guy plays a solid game 95% of the time he's on the ice, but let's up that one bad play? "THAT MOTHERFUCKING COCKSUCKER SUCKS AND IS THE WORST PLAYER IN HOCKEY!!!11!!!!"

Sound familiar? I pulled a very similar quote from you in another thread.

But you know you're SO negative so you just SO hardcore.

PS, speed this up. I bought this beer for T-day dinner tomorrow. I'm enjoying it way too much., Also, Mad Elf is good, but it's no Belgian dark.


Lol casual fan. How long have you been skating?


Since 5 years old, actually. I can send you the google coordinates of the pond I learned on, if you like.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9314
Show that quote.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 1867
Quote:
Fuck you Letang you fucking idiot.

What a dumb penalty. Guy fucking sucks right now


I already said that my post was meant as what I consider obvious hyperbole. I know you're desperate ass will try and parse words and make this sound like something completely different....but it's not.

The fact of the matter remains that you got your panties up in bunch over a couple bad plays and tried to make Letnag look like a terrible defenseman, when, in fact, he was still better than a lot of defenseman out there. He just made some high profile bad passes and you, being the casual fan you are, made it out to be worse than it was.

He didn't "fucking suck". He was playing well below his capable level for sure, but he didn't "fucking suck", unless you're a know-nothing fan that insist that even bad play means the player who did it is absolutely terrible.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 1867
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Orangesteel wrote:
Louis Lipps Service wrote:

Dear Orange Crushed,

I know more than you do, that's for sure. Most surefire sign of a casual fan is the 'highlight reel" fan. IE, the guy notices the high profile misses and makes, and bases on his opinion only on those plays.

Guy plays a solid game 95% of the time he's on the ice, but let's up that one bad play? "THAT MOTHERFUCKING COCKSUCKER SUCKS AND IS THE WORST PLAYER IN HOCKEY!!!11!!!!"

Sound familiar? I pulled a very similar quote from you in another thread.

But you know you're SO negative so you just SO hardcore.

PS, speed this up. I bought this beer for T-day dinner tomorrow. I'm enjoying it way too much., Also, Mad Elf is good, but it's no Belgian dark.


Lol casual fan. How long have you been skating?


Since 5 years old, actually. I can send you the google coordinates of the pond I learned on, if you like.


You want that pond GPS or not? This is the second time you've asked me if I play. Second time you've ignored my response. Methinks you don't like my answers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pens vs Canucks 11-22-17
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9314
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Quote:
Fuck you Letang you fucking idiot.

What a dumb penalty. Guy fucking sucks right now


I already said that my post was meant as what I consider obvious hyperbole. I know you're desperate ass will try and parse words and make this sound like something completely different....but it's not.

The fact of the matter remains that you got your panties up in bunch over a couple bad plays and tried to make Letnag look like a terrible defenseman, when, in fact, he was still better than a lot of defenseman out there. He just made some high profile bad passes and you, being the casual fan you are, made it out to be worse than it was.

He didn't "fucking suck". He was playing well below his capable level for sure, but he didn't "fucking suck", unless you're a know-nothing fan that insist that even bad play means the player who did it is absolutely terrible.


Uh, where did I say he’s the worst player in hockey? Yes, parsing words, sound familiar?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 103 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group