It is currently Fri Nov 24, 2017 7:22 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Is Bell really a great receiving back?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:08 pm
Posts: 5047
Scunge wrote:
This infatuation with Bell and this propaganda of him being like a WR out there is bullshit.
I ain't no expert, but I approve of this message. He was never fast enough to begin with, and less so now after 2 injuries.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Bell really a great receiving back?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 12:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 12:48 pm
Posts: 955
Scunge wrote:
I thought it was interesting that Eli Rogers was active for this game but only had 13 snaps on offense and was credited with 1 special teams snap. He was not targeted at all.

I have a hard time understanding how he fits in with this team moving forward. You can't just remove JuJu from the field he is your second most productive WR in terms of catch percentage, first down percentage, his blocking, scoring. Brown is not coming off the field. Bryant has to be a presence on the field, the vertical threat.

Do we run 4 wides with Bell and no TEs? Again, I would rather see Vance McDonald on the field, we have to get him involved in this offense, beyond his magnificent blocking in the run game.

The best 5 to get on the field, are Brown, Bryant, JuJu, McDonald and Bell. How does Rogers fit in? That best 5 allows you to use JuJu as a quasi-TE, we have seen how he can crack down on Safeties and Linebackers, Rogers can't do that. And I would argue that Jesse James can't do that either if he were to come on the field to be that second TE.

They need to drastically reduce the number of snaps and targets that Jesse James and Eli Rogers get and dramatically increase the snaps that JuJu and Vance McDonald do get. That is the transition that is starting to take place but it is not happening fast enough for me.

Rogers has seen his snaps go from 39 to 37 to 21 to 13, while JuJu has seen his increase 25, 38, 51, 54, 66, 43, to nearly 67% of the snaps on offense. YES!!! That has to continue. Our three amigos at WR have to be Brown, Bryant and JuJu, that is your best 3 WRs.

At TE I feel the transition to McDonald as the #1 starter is happening, just at a slower pace due to him being signed so late and having to learn the offense on the fly without the benefit of an offseason or training camp. Twice in the past 3 games he has gotten over 30 snaps and they are using him to get the running game going with his blocking. Honestly, I know his pass catching will eventually take off but I have been surprised at his blocking, just did not expect it to be so strong.

I feel like they need to just bite the bullet and give McDonald the majority of the snaps. Say there is 70 snaps a game, yes, they do use two TE sets but the breakdown of snaps has been James seeing 85%, McDonald seeing 26% and Grimble with 6%. They need to flip McDonald and James. Vance needs to be getting the 50-60-70 snaps a game not Jesse James. With more snaps comes more targets and more opportunities to develop as a pass catcher.

This past game James saw 86% of the snaps, 55 snaps, and did not have a single catch. I can't even remember if they even threw a single pass his way. Maybe somebody else can chime in here but when was the last time a Pittsburgh Steeler #1 TE saw 86% of the snaps on offense and wasn't even targeted in the passing game? I think the writing is on the wall with Jesse James, it is almost Vance McDonald time as the #1 TE and it can't come soon enough for me.

I agree Scunge. Tomlin is trying to let Eli down easy by stating his major role on this team is on ST as the PR. It's Ju-Ju time for sure. Vance is next, imo. His blocking doesn't surprise me a bit; he just never got a chance to show it much with the Niners. He actually has longer arms (sans Ali), bigger hands and more bench reps than any of our staring O linemen, much less TEs. He's an elite athlete. If he can improve his hands just a little (and I think he will) he might make fans stop longing for the return of the ghost from Heeeeath past. He is a very underrated signing. My guess is we see more of him between the 20s and James gets a few more red zone targets.

I believe James got one thrown his way, which he didn't catch. It was covered well and a tough catch.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Bell really a great receiving back?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:14 pm
Posts: 1263
And with Jesse James having a role in terms of two TE sets, wouldn't it be better to have Rosie Nix on the field instead?

I look at the times Bell has rushed for over 100 yards this year and it sure seemed like Rosie Nix and Vance McDonald were there blocking there asses off for Bell.

Is James needed out there as a 2nd TE? Nix can be a devastating blocker. With JuJu, Nix and McDonald, that is like an unholy trio of badass blockers that defenses don't want to face. I have lost count of the times that I have seen this trio do pancake blocks on defenders. James? He is soft.

Rosie has shown that he does not have hands of stone as a pass catcher, that I have seen over the years with him. It isn't just a foregone conclusion that he would offer nothing in the passing game, they could still throw check downs to him, and lets face it, James 8.4 yards per catch is pretty dismal. Yes, Rosie only has 4 catches for 21 yards for his career, but he caught 4 of the 5 passes thrown to him, and that 5.3 yard average is equal to what Bell is doing THIS season.

I am not saying that Nix should see 60% of the snaps or anything like that but I think he should get 25-30% of the snaps and that it should come at the expense of less 2 TE sets. To me there is this big black hole sucking up too many snaps that should be going elsewhere on offense and that black hole is Jesse James.

Nix, McDonald, Grimble need more snaps and the way to get them those snaps is to phase out Jesse James.

_________________
The Steelers have a greater chance of finding a Unicorn, or a Sasquatch, or the Loch Ness Monster than they do in finding another great 3-4 OLB.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Bell really a great receiving back?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:36 pm
Posts: 341
No one can supplant the mighty outlaw!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Bell really a great receiving back?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:16 pm
Posts: 5814
I'd like Bell to see some more receptions as I have him in a PPR league

_________________
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GflYTviOIag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Bell really a great receiving back?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:14 pm
Posts: 1263
I dont do fantasy football and actually think it is ultimately bad for the game. It almost seems like some players are more concerned with personal stats and less with winning football games. But that is a topic for another day.

In regards to Bell and Brown seeing so much production, in being such a big part of our offense, isn't is bordering on 70% of our offense? That is ridiculous. I suppose I could get behind them hogging so much of the football if they were producing TDs at a fantastic rate. Is that happening? Nope.

Brown has been targeted 74 times in the passing game and has... just 2 TDs. Bell has been targeted 39 times in the passing game and has... 0 TDs. Those are your #1 and #2 options in the passing game and in 113 targets have produced just 2 passing TDs.

If you project that out over a 16 game season, is that what we want for our offense, no strike that, WHAT WE NEED for our offense? I said before the season that we don't need Brown to have 150 receptions for 2,000 yards and we don't need Bell to have 100 receptions and that if we did it will probably mean that our offense is struggling.

Sure enough that is happening after 6 games. For all of those catches and yards, Brown has just 2 TDs. For all of Bell's production he only has 4 TDs.

My perfect Steeler offense that COULD score 30 points a game is something like this:

Brown, 90 catches
Bell 65 catches
Bryant 60 catches
JuJu 60 catches
McDonald 50 catches

60 catches for everybody else (James,Grimble, Rogers, Hunter, Bey, Connor, Watson)

But that will never happen, JuJu, Bryant and McDonald are never going to be big parts of this offense if Brown and Bell are combing for 210-220 receptions. We have been averaging 385 completions the past two years, but If Brown is chasing Marvin Harrison's 143 or Megatron's 1,964 and Bell is trying to get over 100 and prove to everybody how much he is this great WR as a RB, that leave less for everybody else on offense. And maybe I could get behind the idea of those two chasing the glory if they were scoring TDs and the offense was productive, but they aren't and the offense isn't.

What good is fantasy football glory if you aren't winning games and the offense isn't scoring points? Piss on Brown getting NFL records and Bell trying to prove this or that, I just want an offense to score points, to average over 30 points a game and make it more likely to bring home #7.

_________________
The Steelers have a greater chance of finding a Unicorn, or a Sasquatch, or the Loch Ness Monster than they do in finding another great 3-4 OLB.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Bell really a great receiving back?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 1:23 pm
Posts: 2637
Bell is an Elite recieving back. He's off to a slow start this year, because he stupidly skipped training camp. And because the offense has mostly been stuck in 2nd gear.

Last season in only 12 games, he had 1884 total yards and 75 catches for 616 yards, 8.2 yds/rec. those are elite numbers for an RB. The talk of him being a WR is bullshit, he's an RB who is a threat running or catching. All RBs get mostly short routes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Bell really a great receiving back?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:34 am
Posts: 4840
At least early in the game, Jesse James was springing Bell with big blocks. If he truly sucks at blocking, he is improving. In terms of McDonald, I get damned tired of hearing about potential, and all these measurables. He needs to put up on the field. Bottom line. There is a reason SF didn't think much of him and invested draft picks on other TE's to supplant him. It wasn't because he was young and had great strength, arm length, and other underwear measurables.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Bell really a great receiving back?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:16 pm
Posts: 5814
R S wrote:
At least early in the game, Jesse James was springing Bell with big blocks. If he truly sucks at blocking, he is improving. In terms of McDonald, I get damned tired of hearing about potential, and all these measurables. He needs to put up on the field. Bottom line. There is a reason SF didn't think much of him and invested draft picks on other TE's to supplant him. It wasn't because he was young and had great strength, arm length, and other underwear measurables.


McDonald lacks serious HIG factor.....

_________________
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GflYTviOIag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Bell really a great receiving back?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 9:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:08 pm
Posts: 470
Kodiak wrote:
His YPC have been discussed. But I'm wondering if this receiving reputation really doesn't just stem from a few big plays earlier in his career when the defense was sleeping or caught off-guard.

He's not fast, and he's not actually a receiver....I think people felt his shifty-ness and quick feet translate to running good routes and separation, but I'm not seeing it.

He has good hands, but that's only part of the equation. Do you think there's still potential there, or is it time for the infatuation with splitting him out and running a tree to end?

"2nd best" receiver last year? I'm not even sure if he's our 4th or 5th best option in the passing game this year.
Screens and outlets, sure. But maybe it's time to ditch the designed pass plays for this guy.

Good game or not, he looks slower this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group