Jobus Rum wrote:
955876 wrote:
Jobus Rum wrote:
Glocks are kinda the AK-47 of the pistol world. Not the prettiest of firearms but extremely reliable and require very little maintenance to keep them running.
I know some purist don't like Glocks because of the polymer frame and/or blocky look. Plus the grip & grip size just doesn't feel right to some. My Sigs fit much better in hand than my Glocks that's for sure. Sig doesn't have a decent carry option though that's "on roster" in CA so the Glocks win out in that regard.
Is there some reason in particular you don't like them or were you just being funny? Just curious.
Naa, just making a (gun guy) joke. I own two Glocks, 17 and 42. I had a 21, but my future son in law fell in love with it and convinced me to "sell" it to him...
I'm a bit different than most, the first time I picked up a Glock, I just liked the grip and feel, felt real good. Not 1911 good, but very comfortable in my hand.
Thanks. I was just wondering. Some people have real strong opinions one way or the other in regards to Glocks. If you were a true hater I was just curious as to why.
I have the 21, 26, & 36. The grip on the 21 & 36 is fine but the 26 feels like a brick in my hand. It however is the most accurate of the three. Can put 3 full mags into 4-5 holes with that thing.
Used to have the 17 long time ago but traded it to my dad for a Sig.
I'm looking for a 1911 right now but living in CA you have to go used because they are no longer on CA's fucked up "roster". So finding what you want is very hit or miss.