It is currently Sun Nov 18, 2018 4:17 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 10:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:54 pm
Posts: 2253
Kodiak wrote:
RemoAZ wrote:
He can't be the gun slinger he used to be. If he tries, he won't make it to mid season.


I hope that isn't the case, and this is just one of those games Ben has a few times a year.

It's not like he didn't still hold the ball occasionally with Haley. It's just that he got much better at being situationally aware and choosing his spots. The two fumbles was bad situational football. That's a rusty internal clock. The pass to AB was bad situational football, and I think Ben basically admitted wasn't tuned-in to the difference in game speed (a.k.a. lack of reps).

Also, I think it was the Ben/Fitchner show the better part of the second half of last season. So the bedwetting is premature and misguided....I just hope we don't have to suffer thru 6 weeks of it like last year.


Only one was bad. The other the ball was snapped very low. Ben picked it up and went to throw and the defender was there. That’s bad line play, not a bad internal clock.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 23382
Zeke5123 wrote:
Kodiak wrote:
RemoAZ wrote:
He can't be the gun slinger he used to be. If he tries, he won't make it to mid season.


I hope that isn't the case, and this is just one of those games Ben has a few times a year.

It's not like he didn't still hold the ball occasionally with Haley. It's just that he got much better at being situationally aware and choosing his spots. The two fumbles was bad situational football. That's a rusty internal clock. The pass to AB was bad situational football, and I think Ben basically admitted wasn't tuned-in to the difference in game speed (a.k.a. lack of reps).

Also, I think it was the Ben/Fitchner show the better part of the second half of last season. So the bedwetting is premature and misguided....I just hope we don't have to suffer thru 6 weeks of it like last year.


Only one was bad. The other the ball was snapped very low. Ben picked it up and went to throw and the defender was there. That’s bad line play, not a bad internal clock.


It’s both. He needed to eat it there...took him a precious couple of seconds to scoop it up.

_________________
“A set of several simple rules leads to complex, intelligent behavior. While a set of complex rules often leads to dumb and primitive behavior.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 3:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:54 pm
Posts: 2253
Clock is to get it out in 3 seconds. Ben was throwing in under 3 seconds from the snap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 4:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 4:46 pm
Posts: 202
Stosh-67 wrote:
Stairway 2 Seven wrote:
If they dont incorporate play action into this offense and continue using 1 rb for all the plays then this haleyball 2.0.


Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

This is Tomlins offense, his scheme, his style of play.
OC change and we see the same exact things.
Little to no PA.
Single back miss-use.
Inferior vet players getting snaps over better more talent players.
Turtling a big lead.
Running into stacked boxes.
Punting as the safer option deep in Cleveland territory - 2nd and 10 at the Cleveland 38, two runs and a punt from the 34.
Playing it safe in OT with a run into a stacked box and a stretch right run with a running back going on his 30th and 31st carry of game. ( he had 32 carries all of 2017 )
Settling for a 42 yard FG in the rain and wind, on a grass field that saw 68 minutes of tread and wear.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.




Yep....got that right.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16557
Orangesteel wrote:
To our resident tape scrubbers (or anyone else keeping track), please remind me, do you recall seeing much of, if any, play action passing routes called against Cleveland? The way they were stacking the box in the second half, you would think it would be ripe for PA calls and hitting the intermediate parts of the field.

Because what I recall seeing actually looked a lot like a Haley called game, sans the QB sneak and about 5-7 less WR screens than Haley would have called (though I don’t recall seeing Tyrod throw too many for the Stains).

Am I off here? Or maybe can we conclude that Ben doesn’t like the PA anymore? Or are we going back to the tremendous amount of rainfall?

We essentially lost the win on a PA pass strip sack FTW

If only you asshats were as positive when the team plays well, that would be something. I’m not exactly on the bandwagon yet, but this place is absurd lately.

_________________
VASteelerGuy wrote:
These refs suck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:12 pm
Posts: 4201
What’s absurd are the decisions Tomlin makes. That leads to the “absurdity” here.

It’s stuff like the punt in Cleveland territory up 14. How many yards are even gained on that? 15? 12?

23?

You can end the game with more points there. Oh but Ben might throw another pic? Well, one of his pics was better than a Berry punt in terms of net yards. In other words, a turnover there isn’t much difference than punting.

Oh but on a punt we got the punt coverage. Thought we didn’t live in our fears.

If those chicken shit decisions weren’t being made with regularity there would not be so much bitching about all the other stuff.

It’s football. Shit happens.

A good portion of our shit is entirely self inflicted. We put ourselves in these positions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:12 pm
Posts: 4201
And to Stosh, that list is spot on...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9199
I know I’m an asshat, and I do get positive when we win, but that tie was just bizarre. Up 14 with 7 min left and it went as downhill as it possibly could.

It’s Super Bowl or bust this season and until Ben retires. Tying the Browns isn’t on our way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 23382
955876 wrote:
What’s absurd are the decisions Tomlin makes. That leads to the “absurdity” here.

It’s stuff like the punt in Cleveland territory up 14. How many yards are even gained on that? 15? 12?

23?

You can end the game with more points there. Oh but Ben might throw another pic? Well, one of his pics was better than a Berry punt in terms of net yards. In other words, a turnover there isn’t much difference than punting.

Oh but on a punt we got the punt coverage. Thought we didn’t live in our fears.

If those chicken shit decisions weren’t being made with regularity there would not be so much bitching about all the other stuff.

It’s football. Shit happens.

A good portion of our shit is entirely self inflicted. We put ourselves in these positions.


Like I pointed out on Sunday, do you know what made that punt more absurd?

It was the play call on third and ten from the Cleveland 38.

The play call was a run (it gained four yards).

When I saw it was a run, I was thinking "Yay! We're in the pink zone, and the Steelers FINALLY realize the pink zone can be four down territory!"

It was literally the ONLY way a run call there made sense.

Then they punted, and rudely jolted me back into the reality of the team for which I cheer.

:roll: :roll:

_________________
“A set of several simple rules leads to complex, intelligent behavior. While a set of complex rules often leads to dumb and primitive behavior.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:58 pm
Posts: 6980
Jeemie wrote:
955876 wrote:
What’s absurd are the decisions Tomlin makes. That leads to the “absurdity” here.

It’s stuff like the punt in Cleveland territory up 14. How many yards are even gained on that? 15? 12?

23?

You can end the game with more points there. Oh but Ben might throw another pic? Well, one of his pics was better than a Berry punt in terms of net yards. In other words, a turnover there isn’t much difference than punting.

Oh but on a punt we got the punt coverage. Thought we didn’t live in our fears.

If those chicken shit decisions weren’t being made with regularity there would not be so much bitching about all the other stuff.

It’s football. Shit happens.

A good portion of our shit is entirely self inflicted. We put ourselves in these positions.


Like I pointed out on Sunday, do you know what made that punt more absurd?

It was the play call on third and ten from the Cleveland 38.

The play call was a run (it gained four yards).

When I saw it was a run, I was thinking "Yay! We're in the pink zone, and the Steelers FINALLY realize the pink zone can be four down territory!"

It was literally the ONLY way a run call there made sense.

Then they punted, and rudely jolted me back into the reality of the team for which I cheer.

:roll: :roll:

Hey...when your punter averages 33 ypp, punting from the 34 is the way to go. Aviators is a freakin football genius.

_________________
"They're standing around, Butz!" - Kevin O'Shea


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16557
If it were madden and not pouring rain all day onto a grass/mud field, and the computer ignored that the OL had recently been getting tooled, I'll bet you a computer analysis would have said it was like overwhelmingly in favor of going for it on that 4th down.

Jeemie, you seem like a devoted fan, and that makes you my brother... but sometimes you kill me with your takes that seem to ignore football realities, like blaming any QB for that bad-snap sack. I wonder if you critique your wife with the same certainty of judgment and high standards of accountability. Doing that at home would be one way of understanding that there are contextual factors in every analysis.

_________________
VASteelerGuy wrote:
These refs suck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 23382
bradshaw2ben wrote:
If it were madden and not pouring rain all day onto a grass/mud field, and the computer ignored that the OL had recently been getting tooled, I'll bet you a computer analysis would have said it was like overwhelmingly in favor of going for it on that 4th down.

Jeemie, you seem like a devoted fan, and that makes you my brother... but sometimes you kill me with your takes that seem to ignore football realities, like blaming any QB for that bad-snap sack. I wonder if you critique your wife with the same certainty of judgment and high standards of accountability. Doing that at home would be one way of understanding that there are contextual factors in every analysis.


Then why run on 3rd and 10?

That was my point.

_________________
“A set of several simple rules leads to complex, intelligent behavior. While a set of complex rules often leads to dumb and primitive behavior.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16557
Ordinarily, I'd agree with you-- your play choice on 3rd down helps dictate what you do on 4th down... but maybe they thought they'd do better on the run play... maybe they were concerned about pass pro at that moment in the game (warranted based on what happened after that)... maybe they thought: we're up by two TDs, vs a team that hasn't won in close to two years, in a monsoon, on a waterlogged/muddy field, vs a team we've stopped cold all day long, and we can roll some clock on 3rd down and pin them back deep in their end with only about 3 possessions left for them in the game.

_________________
VASteelerGuy wrote:
These refs suck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 23382
bradshaw2ben wrote:
Ordinarily, I'd agree with you-- your play choice on 3rd down helps dictate what you do on 4th down... but maybe they thought they'd do better on the run play... maybe they were concerned about pass pro at that moment in the game (warranted based on what happened after that)... maybe they thought: we're up by two TDs, vs a team that hasn't won in close to two years, in a monsoon, on a waterlogged/muddy field, vs a team we've stopped cold all day long, and we can roll some clock on 3rd down and pin them back deep in their end with only about 3 possessions left for them in the game.


That's by far an even worse decision. When has turtling that early in the 3rd/4th Quarter...even given the soggy conditions?

That's Tomlin discounting an opponent...that doesn't make me feel better about him.

And this is what we're saying...you can talk about the conditions all you want...so many decisions Tomlin makes...treating the opener as a fifth preseason game because he plays his starting offense together for five minutes in all of preseason...running the wheels off a RB that hasn't had that many carries in a game since college two years ago and who was visibly slowing down...showing no apparent understanding of when to take risks and when to get conservative...running a four minute offense with a quarter and a half left...these all likely feed into the bizarre outcome that is becoming far too frequent when we play bad teams.

No desire to get better...no desire to learn from the past...just a lot of empty catchphrases like "we don't live in our fears" when that's ALL Tomlin does.

I don't know what happened to him...he wasn't like this at the outset of his career.

All I know is it's as frustrating as hell to watch other coaches and teams in this league starting to pass Mike Tomlin and the Steelers by.

_________________
“A set of several simple rules leads to complex, intelligent behavior. While a set of complex rules often leads to dumb and primitive behavior.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 144
I think rpos will be the closest thing to play action that we see. Ben keeps control and he doesnt turn.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:18 pm
Posts: 10592
ive also notched ben does not pump fake much any more. remember he would do it so much; almost maddening as too much. announcers would fawn over his greatness at the pump fake. well id like to see some. fake the throw and throw it elsewhere ben. maybe an open man instead of a blanketed receiver or a bee hive of the enemy..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16557
well, obviously not going to see too many pump fakes in a driving rainstorm

Jeemie, I don't think punting from the opponent's 35 with a 2 TD lead in the rain qualifies as turtling. It's a conservative play, but it's what pretty much every coach in the league does in that situation, right or wrong.

_________________
VASteelerGuy wrote:
These refs suck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 7:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 12:10 am
Posts: 627
bradshaw2ben wrote:
well, obviously not going to see too many pump fakes in a driving rainstorm

Jeemie, I don't think punting from the opponent's 35 with a 2 TD lead in the rain qualifies as turtling. It's a conservative play, but it's what pretty much every coach in the league does in that situation, right or wrong.


Most coaches are morons.

Pederson, McVay, and probably Belichick play to end the game right there.

A six-minute, 12-play, 52-yard drive that ends with a 22-yard punt (and Cleveland got 18 of those yards back in four seconds). Don"t give me some bullshit that there were pressing concerns about an offensive unit that is sustaining a 12-play drive.

Up 14, yes, you're going to win the game but your opponent is really going to make you work for it. Up 21, the game is over. The intensity drops from a ten to a one.

Dumb coaches play for one win. Smart coaches play for the season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 8:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 23382
tunch wrote:
bradshaw2ben wrote:
well, obviously not going to see too many pump fakes in a driving rainstorm

Jeemie, I don't think punting from the opponent's 35 with a 2 TD lead in the rain qualifies as turtling. It's a conservative play, but it's what pretty much every coach in the league does in that situation, right or wrong.


Most coaches are morons.

Pederson, McVay, and probably Belichick play to end the game right there.

A six-minute, 12-play, 52-yard drive that ends with a 22-yard punt (and Cleveland got 18 of those yards back in four seconds). Don"t give me some bullshit that there were pressing concerns about an offensive unit that is sustaining a 12-play drive.

Up 14, yes, you're going to win the game but your opponent is really going to make you work for it. Up 21, the game is over. The intensity drops from a ten to a one.

Dumb coaches play for one win. Smart coaches play for the season.


This is where I was at.

The offense had scored 14 points and mounted a 12 play drive in the second half. They were playing much better than they had in the first half

It was the main reason I figured the run call on third and ten signalled a willingness to go for it on fourth down.

Again...silly me, for thinking Tomlin learned anything from last year.

Like I said...that’s what frustrates me.

Mike Tomlin makes the same mistakes over...and over...and over.

To quote Seinfeld...No Learning...No Growing.

Tomlin embraces that.

_________________
“A set of several simple rules leads to complex, intelligent behavior. While a set of complex rules often leads to dumb and primitive behavior.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 12:10 am
Posts: 627
bradshaw2ben wrote:
If it were madden and not pouring rain all day onto a grass/mud field, and the computer ignored that the OL had recently been getting tooled, I'll bet you a computer analysis would have said it was like overwhelmingly in favor of going for it on that 4th down.

Jeemie, you seem like a devoted fan, and that makes you my brother... but sometimes you kill me with your takes that seem to ignore football realities, like blaming any QB for that bad-snap sack. I wonder if you critique your wife with the same certainty of judgment and high standards of accountability. Doing that at home would be one way of understanding that there are contextual factors in every analysis.


I put this to the test and my wife called me a pussyboy faggot when I suggested punting from the opponent's 34.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baltostiller, Google [Bot] and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group