It is currently Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:19 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Play Action?
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 9815
To our resident tape scrubbers (or anyone else keeping track), please remind me, do you recall seeing much of, if any, play action passing routes called against Cleveland? The way they were stacking the box in the second half, you would think it would be ripe for PA calls and hitting the intermediate parts of the field.

Because what I recall seeing actually looked a lot like a Haley called game, sans the QB sneak and about 5-7 less WR screens than Haley would have called (though I don’t recall seeing Tyrod throw too many for the Stains).

Am I off here? Or maybe can we conclude that Ben doesn’t like the PA anymore? Or are we going back to the tremendous amount of rainfall?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:16 pm
Posts: 6969
Because Tomlin

Rain

Poorly prepared team

What is Play Action?

_________________
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GflYTviOIag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 12074
Orangesteel wrote:
Am I off here? Or maybe can we conclude that Ben doesn’t like the PA anymore? Or are we going back to the tremendous amount of rainfall?


I guess we'll find out as the season unfolds. But we have Ben running a sneak, and then taking off on a scramble....and holding the ball longer than he has in years (and getting sacked 4 times)....

Maybe Haley WAS forcing Ben to play a certain way, and Ben didn't like it. You're leading late in Q4 - can't hold the ball like that and risk strip sacks. That's just bad situational football.

Now Ben never said he had a problem running the sneak. I believe he HAS said he doesn't like turning his back to the defense on PA (which is complete bullshit, whether he means it or not).

_________________
------------------------------------------------------


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:51 pm
Posts: 1240
Haley was brought in specifically to force Ben to get rid of the ball so he could stay healthy. I don't give a shit if they liked each other or not. Haley did what he was supposed to do and Ben and the team were better for it. The problem is Haley sucked as a play caller. Now Ben has more control. Remember how Arians' QBs always got hit and injured a lot? Hopefully this last performace was just because Ben was at about preseason game #2 and not because he wants to go back in time. He can't be the gun slinger he used to be. If he tries, he won't make it to mid season.

_________________
Howard Griffith had to resort to chop-blocking him during the 1997 AFC Championship Game. An incredulous Kirkland asked “Why do you have to use cheap tactics like chop-blocking?” Griffith replied by asking, “Why do you have to be a 300-pound linebacker?”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 12074
RemoAZ wrote:
He can't be the gun slinger he used to be. If he tries, he won't make it to mid season.


I hope that isn't the case, and this is just one of those games Ben has a few times a year.

It's not like he didn't still hold the ball occasionally with Haley. It's just that he got much better at being situationally aware and choosing his spots. The two fumbles was bad situational football. That's a rusty internal clock. The pass to AB was bad situational football, and I think Ben basically admitted wasn't tuned-in to the difference in game speed (a.k.a. lack of reps).

Also, I think it was the Ben/Fitchner show the better part of the second half of last season. So the bedwetting is premature and misguided....I just hope we don't have to suffer thru 6 weeks of it like last year.

_________________
------------------------------------------------------


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:51 pm
Posts: 1240
Kodiak wrote:
RemoAZ wrote:
He can't be the gun slinger he used to be. If he tries, he won't make it to mid season.


I hope that isn't the case, and this is just one of those games Ben has a few times a year.

It's not like he didn't still hold the ball occasionally with Haley. It's just that he got much better at being situationally aware and choosing his spots. The two fumbles was bad situational football. That's a rusty internal clock. The pass to AB was bad situational football, and I think Ben basically admitted wasn't tuned-in to the difference in game speed (a.k.a. lack of reps).

Also, I think it was the Ben/Fitchner show the better part of the second half of last season. So the bedwetting is premature and misguided....I just hope we don't have to suffer thru 6 weeks of it like last year.


Like I said, I think Ben is at about preseason game #2 in getting ready for the season. I'm not in favor of how little the starters play. Belichek plays his starters and they're ready to go every season. Just another way we're out coached every year.

_________________
Howard Griffith had to resort to chop-blocking him during the 1997 AFC Championship Game. An incredulous Kirkland asked “Why do you have to use cheap tactics like chop-blocking?” Griffith replied by asking, “Why do you have to be a 300-pound linebacker?”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:37 pm
Posts: 422
RemoAZ wrote:
Kodiak wrote:
RemoAZ wrote:
He can't be the gun slinger he used to be. If he tries, he won't make it to mid season.


I hope that isn't the case, and this is just one of those games Ben has a few times a year.

It's not like he didn't still hold the ball occasionally with Haley. It's just that he got much better at being situationally aware and choosing his spots. The two fumbles was bad situational football. That's a rusty internal clock. The pass to AB was bad situational football, and I think Ben basically admitted wasn't tuned-in to the difference in game speed (a.k.a. lack of reps).

Also, I think it was the Ben/Fitchner show the better part of the second half of last season. So the bedwetting is premature and misguided....I just hope we don't have to suffer thru 6 weeks of it like last year.


Like I said, I think Ben is at about preseason game #2 in getting ready for the season. I'm not in favor of how little the starters play. Belichek plays his starters and they're ready to go every season. Just another way we're out coached every year.

And now with his elbow issues, he isn't getting the normal reps this week. One game and he's already nursing an injury that's taking away game prep. We might need to start preparing ourselves for the Dobbs Experiment because I have a feeling it's coming sooner than later.

_________________
You're never as good as you think you are, or as bad as they say you are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:45 pm
Posts: 14242
I'm just going to say after one game Fichtner hasn't proven to be the better coordinator. Looks much the same as the last coordinator. Of course the offense not efficiently functioning didn't really help in this one game eval either. It's a wait to see. If it stays like or even resembles what unfolded week one throughout the season it's gonna be a very rough ride. I believe that this team will find it's groove and progressively get much better than week one's performance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2014 2:35 pm
Posts: 211
If they dont incorporate play action into this offense and continue using 1 rb for all the plays then this haleyball 2.0.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 23686
Steelafan77 wrote:
I'm just going to say after one game Fichtner hasn't proven to be the better coordinator. Looks much the same as the last coordinator. Of course the offense not efficiently functioning didn't really help in this one game eval either. It's a wait to see. If it stays like or even resembles what unfolded week one throughout the season it's gonna be a very rough ride. I believe that this team will find it's groove and progressively get much better than week one's performance.


I don’t think you can say this game is indicative of the type of game Fichtner will call.

I think conditions and what happened in game very much dictated the type of game he ended up calling.

And once the Ben/AB chemistry was shown to be off (plus the fact the Browns’ DBs did an excellent job neutralizing AB...Ward looks to be the real deal) and Ben got careless with the football, Fichtner’s and Tomlin’s asses most definitely puckered. I’m sure they were thrilled beyond belief to be up 21-7 and just wanted to get the hell out of Dodge. Rotating the RBs might have helped there.

_________________
“A set of several simple rules leads to complex, intelligent behavior. While a set of complex rules often leads to dumb and primitive behavior.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:31 pm
Posts: 1163
Stairway 2 Seven wrote:
If they dont incorporate play action into this offense and continue using 1 rb for all the plays then this haleyball 2.0.


Unfortunately, Haley used 3 or 4 RB in his offence on Sunday. It has already been said, but I don't think hammering 1 guy all game was exclusively Haley's idea. It was and still is Tomlin's thing! Now, you can say they had Bell (very arguably the best back in the league), so they wanted him on the field in every situation, but it is still not smart football.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 11:10 am
Posts: 1637
Then to summarize this thread:

Haley arrives to protect Ben; minimized play action because the ball should be out of your hands before pressure comes and coverage has time to engage. (QB sneak possibly eliminated too.?)

2018 season opener sees slop conditions and new coordinator. However, Ben seems to be holding the ball too long, where play action would help slow the pressure and freeze the coverage and in fact might be necessary. Potentially they need to double down on the Haley speed ball philosophy. The hybrid with minimized play action will be a failure. Ben and Fitch might be conflating philosophies to the detriment of the offense.

Conditions might have masked the new coordinators philosophy. Too early to get a read. Standby for more evidence.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:47 am
Posts: 4471
Jeemie wrote:
Steelafan77 wrote:
I'm just going to say after one game Fichtner hasn't proven to be the better coordinator. Looks much the same as the last coordinator. Of course the offense not efficiently functioning didn't really help in this one game eval either. It's a wait to see. If it stays like or even resembles what unfolded week one throughout the season it's gonna be a very rough ride. I believe that this team will find it's groove and progressively get much better than week one's performance.


I don’t think you can say this game is indicative of the type of game Fichtner will call.

I think conditions and what happened in game very much dictated the type of game he ended up calling.

And once the Ben/AB chemistry was shown to be off (plus the fact the Browns’ DBs did an excellent job neutralizing AB...Ward looks to be the real deal) and Ben got careless with the football, Fichtner’s and Tomlin’s asses most definitely puckered. I’m sure they were thrilled beyond belief to be up 21-7 and just wanted to get the hell out of Dodge. Rotating the RBs might have helped there.


There was no problem with the game conditions to start the game. The first 2 drives were small ball.

There was a video last week on steelers.com ... Labs talked about Tomlin's early season philosophy regarding offense. Said it's Tomlin's philosophy to "not beat yourself early in the season" (exact words). Now I'm paraphrasing.... Labs basically said he did not expect a wide open offense due to Tomlin's early season football philosophy regarding offense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 2:46 pm
Posts: 1463
What’s also very telling is the number of players and coaches that say the Steelers always play the same way. I’ve heard hasselbeck jake long and Brady and others like Arians say that. Even years apart with different coaches, different players Steelers always seem to take the same mental approach.

Just shows it’s very ingrained culture. Why I wish they would hire more from the outside


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:55 pm
Posts: 4532
Remember when Ben had his foot mangled and they incorporated a ton of Pistol? Then Ben went out and had one of his best string of games.

I don't understand why they don't invoke more of this formation. Ben isn't exactly the most quick/efficient any more to turn himself around.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:58 pm
Posts: 7088
it's still yggy wrote:
What’s also very telling is the number of players and coaches that say the Steelers always play the same way. I’ve heard hasselbeck jake long and Brady and others like Arians say that. Even years apart with different coaches, different players Steelers always seem to take the same mental approach.

Just shows it’s very ingrained culture. Why I wish they would hire more from the outside

Haley was a bad OC and needed to be let go. But the style and scheme of the offense is all Tomlin and A2...organizational philosophy. This how they want to play.
Handing the ball off to the RB over 30 times a game just doesn’t consistently win in the NFL anymore. But...”we do what we do”...

_________________
"They're standing around, Butz!" - Kevin O'Shea


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:47 am
Posts: 4471
it's still yggy wrote:
What’s also very telling is the number of players and coaches that say the Steelers always play the same way. I’ve heard hasselbeck jake long and Brady and others like Arians say that. Even years apart with different coaches, different players Steelers always seem to take the same mental approach.

Just shows it’s very ingrained culture. Why I wish they would hire more from the outside


It is ingrained in the culture.

Tunch on SNR just now... I'm paraphrasing... talked about the Eagles had to run a wide open aggressive offense vs Patriots in the SB because you have to match the Patriots scoring when you play them, but vs teams like the Browns you do not have to run the offense that way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 2:46 pm
Posts: 1463
Havoc wrote:
it's still yggy wrote:
What’s also very telling is the number of players and coaches that say the Steelers always play the same way. I’ve heard hasselbeck jake long and Brady and others like Arians say that. Even years apart with different coaches, different players Steelers always seem to take the same mental approach.

Just shows it’s very ingrained culture. Why I wish they would hire more from the outside


It is ingrained in the culture.

Tunch on SNR just now... I'm paraphrasing... talked about the Eagles had to run a wide open aggressive offense vs Patriots in the SB because you have to match the Patriots scoring when you play them, but vs teams like the Browns you do not have to run the offense that way.

Belichick shits on this organization. And please everyone spare me the greatestest everestest argument. Aggressive vs conservative is sports 101.


Right. I believe a good OC with AB doubled and tripled would still take juju and Washington and shred a D. With just those two. Steelers want to establish the run and Ben is always looking for AB when they get behind the chains.

Good OC would get samuels and ridley some touches too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:20 am
Posts: 5661
Stairway 2 Seven wrote:
If they dont incorporate play action into this offense and continue using 1 rb for all the plays then this haleyball 2.0.


Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

This is Tomlins offense, his scheme, his style of play.
OC change and we see the same exact things.
Little to no PA.
Single back miss-use.
Inferior vet players getting snaps over better more talent players.
Turtling a big lead.
Running into stacked boxes.
Punting as the safer option deep in Cleveland territory - 2nd and 10 at the Cleveland 38, two runs and a punt from the 34.
Playing it safe in OT with a run into a stacked box and a stretch right run with a running back going on his 30th and 31st carry of game. ( he had 32 carries all of 2017 )
Settling for a 42 yard FG in the rain and wind, on a grass field that saw 68 minutes of tread and wear.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.



_________________
"Tomlin doubled down on dumb" JackSplat58


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:16 pm
Posts: 6969
Stosh 100% on point

_________________
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GflYTviOIag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 10:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:54 pm
Posts: 2306
Kodiak wrote:
RemoAZ wrote:
He can't be the gun slinger he used to be. If he tries, he won't make it to mid season.


I hope that isn't the case, and this is just one of those games Ben has a few times a year.

It's not like he didn't still hold the ball occasionally with Haley. It's just that he got much better at being situationally aware and choosing his spots. The two fumbles was bad situational football. That's a rusty internal clock. The pass to AB was bad situational football, and I think Ben basically admitted wasn't tuned-in to the difference in game speed (a.k.a. lack of reps).

Also, I think it was the Ben/Fitchner show the better part of the second half of last season. So the bedwetting is premature and misguided....I just hope we don't have to suffer thru 6 weeks of it like last year.


Only one was bad. The other the ball was snapped very low. Ben picked it up and went to throw and the defender was there. That’s bad line play, not a bad internal clock.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 23686
Zeke5123 wrote:
Kodiak wrote:
RemoAZ wrote:
He can't be the gun slinger he used to be. If he tries, he won't make it to mid season.


I hope that isn't the case, and this is just one of those games Ben has a few times a year.

It's not like he didn't still hold the ball occasionally with Haley. It's just that he got much better at being situationally aware and choosing his spots. The two fumbles was bad situational football. That's a rusty internal clock. The pass to AB was bad situational football, and I think Ben basically admitted wasn't tuned-in to the difference in game speed (a.k.a. lack of reps).

Also, I think it was the Ben/Fitchner show the better part of the second half of last season. So the bedwetting is premature and misguided....I just hope we don't have to suffer thru 6 weeks of it like last year.


Only one was bad. The other the ball was snapped very low. Ben picked it up and went to throw and the defender was there. That’s bad line play, not a bad internal clock.


It’s both. He needed to eat it there...took him a precious couple of seconds to scoop it up.

_________________
“A set of several simple rules leads to complex, intelligent behavior. While a set of complex rules often leads to dumb and primitive behavior.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 3:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:54 pm
Posts: 2306
Clock is to get it out in 3 seconds. Ben was throwing in under 3 seconds from the snap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 4:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 4:46 pm
Posts: 202
Stosh-67 wrote:
Stairway 2 Seven wrote:
If they dont incorporate play action into this offense and continue using 1 rb for all the plays then this haleyball 2.0.


Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

This is Tomlins offense, his scheme, his style of play.
OC change and we see the same exact things.
Little to no PA.
Single back miss-use.
Inferior vet players getting snaps over better more talent players.
Turtling a big lead.
Running into stacked boxes.
Punting as the safer option deep in Cleveland territory - 2nd and 10 at the Cleveland 38, two runs and a punt from the 34.
Playing it safe in OT with a run into a stacked box and a stretch right run with a running back going on his 30th and 31st carry of game. ( he had 32 carries all of 2017 )
Settling for a 42 yard FG in the rain and wind, on a grass field that saw 68 minutes of tread and wear.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.




Yep....got that right.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Play Action?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16809
Orangesteel wrote:
To our resident tape scrubbers (or anyone else keeping track), please remind me, do you recall seeing much of, if any, play action passing routes called against Cleveland? The way they were stacking the box in the second half, you would think it would be ripe for PA calls and hitting the intermediate parts of the field.

Because what I recall seeing actually looked a lot like a Haley called game, sans the QB sneak and about 5-7 less WR screens than Haley would have called (though I don’t recall seeing Tyrod throw too many for the Stains).

Am I off here? Or maybe can we conclude that Ben doesn’t like the PA anymore? Or are we going back to the tremendous amount of rainfall?

We essentially lost the win on a PA pass strip sack FTW

If only you asshats were as positive when the team plays well, that would be something. I’m not exactly on the bandwagon yet, but this place is absurd lately.

_________________
bradshaw2ben wrote:
PIT 30, LAC 17, NFL 16


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], RooneyTunes and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group