It is currently Sun Dec 16, 2018 1:47 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:16 pm
Posts: 6985
Obviously wrote:
BarryFoster wrote:
steelmann58 wrote:
I just have this feeling that the qb intrest is all a smoke screen for the steelers to trade down and get more Draft picks.


I’m intrest to see if that happens. If the Steelers trade back I’d be intrest in seeing who they would early 2nd.target


I would like see co.puterjumpstar's big draft baord. I think he worked in a Chinese bank.


Jumpstar published a draft guide that was was second to nun.

_________________
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GflYTviOIag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:34 am
Posts: 5613
steelmann58 wrote:
I just have this feeling that the qb intrest is all a smoke screen for the steelers to trade down and get more Draft picks.


Steelers never trade out of the 1st round. Never.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 11:38 am 
Online

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 12:48 pm
Posts: 1602
R S wrote:
steelmann58 wrote:
I just have this feeling that the qb intrest is all a smoke screen for the steelers to trade down and get more Draft picks.


Steelers never trade out of the 1st round. Never.

Yep, too in love with that 5th year option it brings.

This would be the year though - with the 5-6 QBs falling where they probably will, but...we do what we do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16849
DP39 wrote:
R S wrote:
steelmann58 wrote:
I just have this feeling that the qb intrest is all a smoke screen for the steelers to trade down and get more Draft picks.


Steelers never trade out of the 1st round. Never.

Yep, too in love with that 5th year option it brings.

This would be the year though - with the 5-6 QBs falling where they probably will, but...we do what we do.

just because they trade down, it doesn't mean they have to trade out of the 1st round

_________________
Fuck the Patriots.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:08 pm
Posts: 6735
You guys are way more informed and knowledgable, but I just saw the highlight reels for Guice and Michel, and like Michel a bit more.

Both would be great additions. Michel a c*nt hair slower(4.54 vs 4.49), but he seems more methodical. Both have good vision. Both hit the hole fast. Michel's speed is deceptive. I wonder if they do take one of these guys, would the O line have to adjust? Timing is important. Bell seldomly takes the first hole he sees, and the o line hold on to their blocks a bit more than most.

_________________
"I wish Fraudlin would get testicular cancer and die after he watches me anally penetrate his wife."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:16 pm
Posts: 6985
COR-TEN wrote:
You guys are way more informed and knowledgable, but I just saw the highlight reels for Guice and Michel, and like Michel a bit more.

Both would be great additions. Michel a c*nt hair slower(4.54 vs 4.49), but he seems more methodical. Both have good vision. Both hit the hole fast. Michel's speed is deceptive. I wonder if they do take one of these guys, would the O line have to adjust? Timing is important. Bell seldomly takes the first hole he sees, and the o line hold on to their blocks a bit more than most.


I’m with you. I like Michel over Guice.

_________________
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GflYTviOIag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 2:17 pm 
Online

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 12:48 pm
Posts: 1602
bradshaw2ben wrote:
DP39 wrote:
R S wrote:
I just have this feeling that the qb intrest is all a smoke screen for the steelers to trade down and get more Draft picks.

Steelers never trade out of the 1st round. Never.

Yep, too in love with that 5th year option it brings.

This would be the year though - with the 5-6 QBs falling where they probably will, but...we do what we do.

just because they trade down, it doesn't mean they have to trade out of the 1st round

I considered that, but come on, let's be realistic at least. The four teams behind us are extremely unlikely to trade down to us for a QB or anyone for that matter. If other QB needed teams had already traded into spot 29-32 (from an earlier or later spot), I find it hard to believe they would trade again into our spot. But, we can discuss the .1% scenarios if you really want. You have to also know by now that the Steelers FO is already know by other teams' FOs as a team that's most unlikely to trade very often. Not like the Pats, 49ers, Vikes, Seahawks, Browns and others. I'd be willing to bet we're probably close to, if not, last on that list - over the last handful of years - when draft day trading has become much more popular.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16849
Trade down, trade up. Still end up with extra pick, select Jessie Bates, anyway.

_________________
Fuck the Patriots.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:43 pm
Posts: 4450
I like him too but Michel might be a little less sure handed than Guice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16849
steelmann58 wrote:
I like him too but Michel might be a little less sure handed than Guice

Don't forget Guice played at LSU... where passing offense goes to die.

Look for the clips of his workouts running routes and catching the football... he's going to be really, really good. He might even be a better NFL player than Saquon.

_________________
Fuck the Patriots.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 9:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:06 am
Posts: 9288
Gotta admit between the 2 i like Michel a bit more as well


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 2:54 pm
Posts: 4232
See below. Big red flag on Michel's fumble rate IMO.


Below are the career offensive fumble rates for the top running back prospects in the 2018 NFL Draft class, broken down into five categories:

ELITE (150 or better)

359.0 -- Darrel Williams, LSU

238.7 -- Demario Richard, Arizona State

207.7 -- Ronald Jones, USC

193.3 -- Saquon Barkley, Penn State

191.3 -- Kerryon Johnson, Auburn

181.7 -- Kyle Hicks, TCU

180.6 -- Justin Jackson, Northwestern

174.0 -- Josh Adams, Notre Dame

155.5 -- Jordan Wilkins, Ole Miss

ABOVE AVERAGE (125-149)

142.1 -- Chase Edmonds, Fordham

135.0 -- Lavon Coleman, Washington

124.9 -- Ralph Webb, Vanderbilt

123.3 -- John Kelly, Tennessee

AVERAGE (100-124)

114.0 -- Royce Freeman, Oregon

110.0 -- Phillip Lindsay, Colorado

105.8 -- Rashaad Penny, San Diego State

100.6 -- Derrius Guice, LSU

BELOW AVERAGE (76-99)

98.6 -- Nick Chubb, Georgia

96.0 -- Bo Scarbrough, Alabama

90.0 -- Mark Walton, Miami (Fla.)

88.2 -- Ryan Nall, Oregon State

87.3 -- Ito Smith, Southern Miss

86.8 -- Nyheim Hines, NC State

76.3 -- Jordan Chunn, Troy

RED FLAG (75 or worse)

74.2 -- Roc Thomas, Jacksonville State

67.4 -- Akrum Wadley, Iowa

66.9 -- Jarvion Franklin, Western Michigan

66.5 -- Kalen Ballage, Arizona State

62.5 -- Justin Crawford, West Virginia

58.2 -- Kamryn Pettway, Auburn

55.6 -- Keith Ford, Texas A&M

54.6 -- Sony Michel, Georgia

39.5 -- Jeffery Wilson, North Texas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 11:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:45 am
Posts: 823
If I read this chart right. Michel fumbles twice as often as Guice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16849
Doesn't include Chris Warren III, but Warren fumbled twice in 227 touches (a botched reverse where he tried to jump pass the ball over two defenders & a last second fumble vs Oklahoma)

He'd be in the above average group.

_________________
Fuck the Patriots.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 2:54 pm
Posts: 4232
That's correct. This chart shows fumbles per offensive touch (which can include a catch of course). Michel's is quite bad. It means if he gets 20+ carries and a few catches a game...he'll be fumbling the ball roughly at an average of once every 2 games. That number of course easily could be worse in the NFL because holes are smaller and defenders are even better at stripping the ball. To put it in perspective, I believe Bell's rate is in the 200s. In short, Michel is fairly loose with the football. I'm not saying that can't be improved, but in a draft with a lot of RB talent, do we really need to spend a 1st on Michel?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:08 pm
Posts: 6735
I'm curious. Does anybody know if fumble rates change drastically for players going from college to the NFL or is that something that plagues RB's entering the NFL throughout their careers? IOW, can coaching and practice fix fumble rates?

I'd take either, but there is very little separating them other than fumbling, from what I can tell. College systems notwithstanding. Considering the other holes in starters and depth - both offense and defense - I wouldn't take a RB in the first, especially if the Steeler FO thinks they can strike a deal with the guy with dollar signs for pupils. I know this board hates Conner, but if they can spell Bell, and give Conner and Ridley some touches in 2018, it will prep them for RB by committee. Be it Guice (if they can get him) or someone else. What does the 2019 draft look like for RB's?

_________________
"I wish Fraudlin would get testicular cancer and die after he watches me anally penetrate his wife."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2018 6:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 904
I like Josh Adams in the 5th round.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2018 10:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:58 pm
Posts: 7102
COR-TEN wrote:
I'm curious. Does anybody know if fumble rates change drastically for players going from college to the NFL or is that something that plagues RB's entering the NFL throughout their careers? IOW, can coaching and practice fix fumble rates?

I'd take either, but there is very little separating them other than fumbling, from what I can tell. College systems notwithstanding. Considering the other holes in starters and depth - both offense and defense - I wouldn't take a RB in the first, especially if the Steeler FO thinks they can strike a deal with the guy with dollar signs for pupils. I know this board hates Conner, but if they can spell Bell, and give Conner and Ridley some touches in 2018, it will prep them for RB by committee. Be it Guice (if they can get him) or someone else. What does the 2019 draft look like for RB's?

You can’t coach speed. You can’t coach strength. You can’t coach quickness, or desire. You can’t coach smarts. You CAN absolutely coach a player how to hold on to the football.

_________________
"They're standing around, Butz!" - Kevin O'Shea


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:43 pm
Posts: 4450
I ike Josh Adams late in the Draft if they don't draft a RB early.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:43 pm
Posts: 4450
I also will not be suprised if the steelers go another way when the 28th pick comes up


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 3:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:45 am
Posts: 823
NFL Security claims Guice told different stories and doesn't think it happened.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:34 am
Posts: 5613
Steelergenie wrote:
NFL Security claims Guice told different stories and doesn't think it happened.


That ! Is a red flag

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:34 am
Posts: 5613
franco32 wrote:
See below. Big red flag on Michel's fumble rate IMO.


Below are the career offensive fumble rates for the top running back prospects in the 2018 NFL Draft class, broken down into five categories:

ELITE (150 or better)

359.0 -- Darrel Williams, LSU

238.7 -- Demario Richard, Arizona State

207.7 -- Ronald Jones, USC

193.3 -- Saquon Barkley, Penn State

191.3 -- Kerryon Johnson, Auburn

181.7 -- Kyle Hicks, TCU

180.6 -- Justin Jackson, Northwestern

174.0 -- Josh Adams, Notre Dame

155.5 -- Jordan Wilkins, Ole Miss

ABOVE AVERAGE (125-149)

142.1 -- Chase Edmonds, Fordham

135.0 -- Lavon Coleman, Washington

124.9 -- Ralph Webb, Vanderbilt

123.3 -- John Kelly, Tennessee

AVERAGE (100-124)

114.0 -- Royce Freeman, Oregon

110.0 -- Phillip Lindsay, Colorado

105.8 -- Rashaad Penny, San Diego State

100.6 -- Derrius Guice, LSU

BELOW AVERAGE (76-99)

98.6 -- Nick Chubb, Georgia

96.0 -- Bo Scarbrough, Alabama

90.0 -- Mark Walton, Miami (Fla.)

88.2 -- Ryan Nall, Oregon State

87.3 -- Ito Smith, Southern Miss

86.8 -- Nyheim Hines, NC State

76.3 -- Jordan Chunn, Troy

RED FLAG (75 or worse)

74.2 -- Roc Thomas, Jacksonville State

67.4 -- Akrum Wadley, Iowa

66.9 -- Jarvion Franklin, Western Michigan

66.5 -- Kalen Ballage, Arizona State

62.5 -- Justin Crawford, West Virginia

58.2 -- Kamryn Pettway, Auburn

55.6 -- Keith Ford, Texas A&M

54.6 -- Sony Michel, Georgia

39.5 -- Wilson, North Texas


Shit. Georgia seems to have an issue

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 904
I’ve been hearing that Guice has some “issues” and is a player that has to be monitored by the staff.
That sounds like problems and headaches, and as a pro with a pocket full of money isn’t something I’d like to deal with.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Guice case
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:58 pm
Posts: 7102
cop1211 wrote:
I’ve been hearing that Guice has some “issues” and is a player that has to be monitored by the staff.
That sounds like problems and headaches, and as a pro with a pocket full of money isn’t something I’d like to deal with.

Very immature...is what I’ve been reading.

_________________
"They're standing around, Butz!" - Kevin O'Shea


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CdnSteelerFan, DP39, Google [Bot], Kodiak, RooneyTunes, swissvale72 and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group