Front Page    Register    Login    Forum    FAQ

Board index » Pittsburgh Sports




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:30 pm 
Offline
CINC Facebook
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:08 pm
Posts: 6809
SteelPro wrote:
FortyThree wrote:
steelersin09 wrote:
MeanJoeGreene75 wrote:
Interesting.

All I know is Clint Hurdle is managing this ball club and, so far, has taken the team further than it's been since 1992 in each of them...well last year anyway, and headed the same place or further this year.

I believe a manager can have a lot of influence on a winning or losing team. Danny Murtaugh was one of the greatest managers ever, and Chuck Tanner was not far behind.

Look only to the original article to see but one example. Barajas' turnaround may have a lot to do with how Hurdle handled his early slump. His offensive emergence has won a lot of ball games for us.

Clint Hurdle has a great challenge before him. I believe he's up to it.


The fact that Hurdle has turned this group of Buccos into a winning team speaks for itself. They certainly have performed better in Hurdle's first season and a third than their current talent level.

I hope that Hurdle remains the manager until the Bucs get their next World Series win.


You know the difference between the two Clint Hurdle teams and all the John Russell or Lloyd McClendon teams?

James McDonald
AJ Burnett
Jeff Karstens
Erik Bedard
Jason Grilli
Charlie Morton
Joel Hanrahan
Chris Leroux
Chris Resop
Juan Cruz

Need I continue?

You have to give Hurdle some credit for helping to bring out the best in these players. I completely agree that in his in game tactical decisions leave something to be desired. However I think he has managed his bullpen really well this year. I didn't think he was that bad at it last year actually. His position player switches are odd though.


Yeah I'll give Hurdle credit for getting the best of his players, I've done that in the past. He's seemingly fixed Barajas and Barmes' problems at the plate.

But to act like a baseball manager can be the reason for the success of a club is stupid. Players win the games, talent wins the game. All the strategy in the world isn't going to matter if you can't pitch.

John Russell and Lloyd McClendon could've won this many games with the pitching performances Hurdle has got since he's been here.

To me, the real reason for the team's possibly renaissance is Neal Huntington's ability to build a pitching staff and Ray Searage's ability to maximize the talent of pretty much every pitcher he has under him.

_________________
And then you take a good look around and they stole your rock n roll
And once it's gone you'll never get it back


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:54 pm 
Offline
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:17 pm
Posts: 23211
Neal and Ray deserve every bit of praise. No doubt about it. Clint does too. No doubt about that as well.

_________________
Playing football was the greatest thing that ever happened to me. If I could go out today and suit up, I would do it.--Jack Butler


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:07 pm 
Offline
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:17 pm
Posts: 23211
I'll disagree in every way imaginable that John fucking Russell would have won as many games as we did last year and have done this year so far with the same group of players. You underestimate, by a wide margin, the impact a manager can have on a group of men.

_________________
Playing football was the greatest thing that ever happened to me. If I could go out today and suit up, I would do it.--Jack Butler


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:26 pm 
Offline
CINC Facebook
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:08 pm
Posts: 6809
MeanJoeGreene75 wrote:
I'll disagree in every way imaginable that John fucking Russell would have won as many games as we did last year and have done this year so far with the same group of players. You underestimate, by a wide margin, the impact a manager can have on a group of men.


Why not Russell? Because he was soft-spoken? Because he had no personality?

You give him a team of all-stars and he's winning way more games than he's losing.

This year's Pirates team is cruising toward a collapse too. Why? Because the talent isn't there.

Managers have minimal impact on a baseball game. They can be great motivators sure, but in the end, the best players will be the best and the teams with the best players will win more often than not.

_________________
And then you take a good look around and they stole your rock n roll
And once it's gone you'll never get it back


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:32 pm 
Offline
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:17 pm
Posts: 23211
You and I will have to agree to disagree, for I could not disagree with you more.

Talented teams will win, that is not a question. But a good manager will bring out the best in any group of men, talented or not.

Cruising toward a collapse? Oh yee of little faith.

_________________
Playing football was the greatest thing that ever happened to me. If I could go out today and suit up, I would do it.--Jack Butler


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:36 pm 
Offline
CINC Facebook
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:08 pm
Posts: 6809
MeanJoeGreene75 wrote:
You and I will have to agree to disagree, for I could not disagree with you more.

Talented teams will win, that is not a question. But a good manager will bring out the best in any group of men, talented or not.


It's not a matter of opinion. It's a fact. Managers don't really matter. Or else the best managers would always win regardless of talent.

Read the following article, it might give you a better idea of where I'm coming from: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/artic ... leid=16630

Quote:
Cruising toward a collapse? Oh yee of little faith.


Nothing to do with faith. It's the numbers. They've completely flipped their pythagorean win-loss. They SHOULD be 27-31 right now. I assume two things...

1.) They'll start to hit better and the pythag will move closer to reality.

2.) The pitching falls apart again and we see why there was such a big disparity between the pythag win/loss and reality as they go on another long losing stretch.

_________________
And then you take a good look around and they stole your rock n roll
And once it's gone you'll never get it back


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:38 pm 
Offline
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:17 pm
Posts: 23211
You can cite all the "facts" you want, bro. I still hold to the old school notion that a manager can matter. You and I come to the game from two totally opposite points of view. You come to it from stats, I come to it from feel. Neither is right or wrong. You can cite "facts" all you want to, but "truth" is probably somewhere in the middle.

If hold true to form, you'll respond to this. :)

_________________
Playing football was the greatest thing that ever happened to me. If I could go out today and suit up, I would do it.--Jack Butler


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:42 pm 
Offline
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 4823
Too early in the season for pythag to matter. August is when it really starts to become relevant.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:45 pm 
Offline
CINC Facebook
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:08 pm
Posts: 6809
MeanJoeGreene75 wrote:
You can cite all the "facts" you want, bro. I still hold to the old school notion that a manager can matter. You and I come to the game from two totally opposite points of view. You come to it from stats, I come to it from feel. Neither is right or wrong. You can cite "facts" all you want to, but "truth" is probably somewhere in the middle.

If hold true to form, you'll respond to this. :)


The earth is the center of the universe! The earth is also flat! And hollow!

You couldn't be more wrong. Facts, by their very definition, are indisputably correct.

Baseball is a numbers game, it's not football. The numbers say I'm right.

Your way of thinking is outdated and no offense but it's narrow minded and stupid. It's ignorant to reality. If we were discussing science and using the same ways of thinking you'd be denying that proven scientific facts aren't true because you don't believe in thinking.

That's basically what the argument here is. We can debate whether or not managers make a difference, we cannot argue that managers don't matter insofar as they are only as good as the talent they have on the field.

_________________
And then you take a good look around and they stole your rock n roll
And once it's gone you'll never get it back


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:47 pm 
Offline
CINC Facebook
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:08 pm
Posts: 6809
ol skool wrote:
Too early in the season for pythag to matter. August is when it really starts to become relevant.


Very true, which is why I said they'll either start hitting and the pythag will start to reflect reality or, like last year, the pitching will drop off and they'll suck again.

Will we all rush to blame Clint Hurdle for that like we rush to praise him for their success? After all, it's only fair...

_________________
And then you take a good look around and they stole your rock n roll
And once it's gone you'll never get it back


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Board index » Pittsburgh Sports


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jeemie, steel and 5 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to: