Front Page    Register    Login    Forum    FAQ

Board index » Zone Blitz - Steelers Football Discussion




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Steelers are OLD
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:32 am 
Offline
Unimpeachable
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 2:12 pm
Posts: 8400
Gearing up for the season, it seems like every publication is regurgitating this nonsense about the Steelers being too old in their preseason prognostication articles. I figured I'd humor the idea of cutting every player on the roster 30 or older except for Polamalu and Roethlisberger (please don't turn this into an IC "veteran leaders" flame war thread) to see what the Steelers roster would look like. Here is what I got:

Quote:
Offense = 25
average age (24.5)

OT: Adams 22
Gilbert 24
Colon 28

OG/C: Pouncey 23
Decastro 22
Foster 26
Legursky 26
Beachum 23

RB: Redman 27
Mendenhall 25
Rainey 24
Dwyer 22
Batch 24
Clay 24

WR: Wallace 25
Brown 24
Sanders 25
Clemons 23
Maze 23

QB: Ben 30
J. Johnson 23

TE/FB: Miller 29
Saunders 23
Paulson 23
Johnson 24


A little thin at backup QB and OT, but essentially the same offense the team will field this season. Starks and Cotchery are the only notable losses, neither is a starter.

Quote:
Defense = 25
average age (24.3)
DE: Hood 25
Heyward 23
Bryant 24
Woods 25
Igbinosun 21

NT Mcclendon 26
Ta'amu 21

OLB: Woodley 27
Worilds 24
Carter 23
Robinson 22

ILB Spence 22
Timmons 26
Sylvester 24
Johnson 29

CB: Brown 23
Allen 23
Lewis 26
Carter 24
Frederick 22
Mcfadden 23

S: Polamalu 31
Mundy 27
Cromartie Smith 25
Golden 21


James Harrison is the big loss. Keisel, Clark, Taylor, Hampton, and Foote appear to have replacements on the roster. For all the moaning the media does about the Steelers being old, I think you could make the argument that if they cut every old player on the roster they still have enough talent to be a playoff team. 50 offensive and defensive players with an average age under 25 years old. I think it's safe to say as long as Ben stays healthy, this team is going to be a contender.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers are OLD
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:01 am 
Online
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:01 pm
Posts: 1732
Location: Somewhere, FL
It's funny how 6 guys out of 53 put the avg age up. I think these guys factor in guys like Charlie Batch, who likely wont even see the field, when determining the avg roster age.

Avg 25?!? :shock: That could be the youngest team EVER that could be a legit Super Bowl contender.

Good post!

_________________


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers are OLD
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:03 am 
Offline
Unimpeachable
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 2:12 pm
Posts: 8400
From Alan Robinson in the Trib
Quote:
7 Too many 30-somethings? The Steelers still have plenty of 30-plus players remaining even after all the offseason departures. There are 15 on their camp roster, including Roethlisberger and Troy Polamalu. Some players hit the wall once they reach 30, becoming more prone to up-and-down performances and injuries. Obviously, the Steelers need a lot more good years out of arguably their two highest-profile players.


Is 15 too many 30-somethings on an 90 man camp roster? Only 7 are starters.

The Patriots have 16 30-somethings on their roster.
The Ravens have 11, but 8 figure to be starters.
Those "young" Chargers have 20 30+ players on the roster.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers are OLD
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:18 am 
Offline
Hall of Famer

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:18 am
Posts: 1724
it's hard to argue the point on O.

on D tho? your post shows that we have 7 30+ starters on D. yes, if you don't count one of them, then we only have 6:/

for the 'under 30' version of our D, i'm happy at DE, LOLB, and one ILB spot. then 7 question marks; guys that have never started a season in the NFL and weren't considered high-end prospects coming out. but next man up and the standard is the standard etc.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers are OLD
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:29 am 
Online
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:01 pm
Posts: 1732
Location: Somewhere, FL
mick fadden wrote:
on D tho? your post shows that we have 7 30+ starters on D. yes, if you don't count one of them, then we only have 6:/


Starting the season, Ike Troy Clark Foote Harrison & Keisel. Hamp is iffy, but he's a spot starter anyway.

_________________


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers are OLD
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:30 am 
Offline
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:16 pm
Posts: 15521
Quote:
Steelers are OLD
Where have we heard this before? :lol:

Not unusual for most teams to field a half dozen 30+ players. I don't understand the media fixation with Steelers players ages. Seems to me like so many out there just want the Steelers to fall off the face of the planet that they try to turn wishful thinking into reality. Good, I love being the underdog and counted out. See ya in January bitches. 8-)

_________________
Honor the Fallen. http://www.militarytimes.com/valor/
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers are OLD
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:41 am 
Offline
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:03 pm
Posts: 6879
Location: NW Ohio
Steelafan77 wrote:
Quote:
Steelers are OLD
Where have we heard this before? :lol:

I don't understand the media fixation with Steelers players ages.


It's Warren Sapp. He said something that made sense after getting our asses whooped in Balt. Averge Fan Joe thinks "yea he's right...they did just get beat pretty bad. Warren Sapp seems like a smart guy and I believe him".
Average Fan Joe goes back to following his favorite team and watching fantasy stats the rest of the year. Sees the playoff highlights shown a billion times where 30+ year old Ike Taylor gets outrun to the EZ for the win.

Repeat something enough times and anyone will believe it is true.

_________________

I'm sick of hearing 'bout the have and have-not's
Have some personal accountability
The biggest problem with the way that we are doing things is
The more we let you have, the less that I'll be keeping for me


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers are OLD
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:41 am 
Offline
SteelerFury Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:02 am
Posts: 15118
Not being a dick I pointed this out in May...You could hear crickets.

The Steelers will be too young next year...I don't get it.

_________________


http://www.gofundme.com/2vpa9o


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers are OLD
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:43 am 
Offline
SteelerFury Writer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 2:39 pm
Posts: 7358
Yep, good stuff Perch.

It really just comes down to lazy research/reporting from the national sports media. It's sort of like how in 2007 when we were still hearing stuff about how good and physical the Steelers o-line was when it was clear to anyone who really watched the team that the level of play and level of talent had dropped significantly from where it had been (Sean Mahan, anyone?). It also took them forever to come around to the idea that Roethlisberger was actually carrying the offense and not the running game, among other examples.

That write up I did a few months back on the Steelers youth on offense... when you look at the top 12 players on offense for the Steelers going into 2012, if you factor Mike Adams as a starter (and I believe he will start), the Steelers will have the youngest offense in the entire NFL this season. And as you hit on, with the D we've got some aging stars, like any team that has been good, but the front seven has quality young replacements in every spot outside of arguably replacing Harrison. We all like our young corners and we'll need to address safety here in the next year or two, but the Steelers really are in a great position with their roster right now. In next year's draft that's probably the two areas they will target outside of BPA thinking.

_________________
“It’s not hunger that drives me, it’s not hunger that needs to drive our football team. Hunger and thirst are things that can be quenched. We have to be a driven group, we have to seek greatness.” – Mike Tomlin


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steelers are OLD
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:52 am 
Offline
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:16 pm
Posts: 15521
Quote:
30+ year old Ike Taylor gets outrun to the EZ for the win.
Has nothing to do with Ike's age. I just won't except that as the cause of that play being successful for the donks. I think there was a miscommunication in the secondary and the donks took advantage of it. JMO

_________________
Honor the Fallen. http://www.militarytimes.com/valor/
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » Zone Blitz - Steelers Football Discussion


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BethlehemSteel, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Steelerblue and 15 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to: